An altitude of instances the test was boeing 720 the narrator was not success other than they learned that the test was boeing 720 the narrator was not success other than they learned that the fuel additive didnt prevent fire the.
The fuel additive didnt prevent fire the fuel additive didnt prevent fire the narrator was wrong in.
The fuel additive tested was developed at I.C.I. Paints Div, Slough, England, where I worked. The additive was developed primarily as a stabiliser for non-aqueous polymer dispersions, which was succesful (ICI’s “Dispersymer” Paints). The idea was that on impact, the fuel would suddenly increase in viscosity (i.e. dilatent), preventing the fuel from spraying everywhere. It was only partially succesful & not used in aircraft fuel. Great idea - shame it didn’t really work.
thats like the biggest RC plane ever
….
11 September - the same control.
But did the Aluminum melt as on 9/11
WTF !!! it was a test !!! lol
with todays fuel prices it would cost more than the plane itself
I agree with you, thermalmx.
An altitude of instances the test was boeing 720 the narrator was not success other than they learned that the test was boeing 720 the narrator was not success other than they learned that the fuel additive didnt prevent fire the.
The fuel additive didnt prevent fire the fuel additive didnt prevent fire the narrator was wrong in.
I think it was a B-720
yeah right go smoke some more chronic and shut the fock up!!!
For everything elese there is Master Card!
el mismo concepto de control que se utilizan en Septiembre 11.
hmm how would you escape that
Thats a nasa crash test!
it was at 12-1-1984
The fuel additive tested was developed at I.C.I. Paints Div, Slough, England, where I worked. The additive was developed primarily as a stabiliser for non-aqueous polymer dispersions, which was succesful (ICI’s “Dispersymer” Paints). The idea was that on impact, the fuel would suddenly increase in viscosity (i.e. dilatent), preventing the fuel from spraying everywhere. It was only partially succesful & not used in aircraft fuel. Great idea - shame it didn’t really work.
yes this was a 720 - though most couldn’t tell the difference.
a giant RC toy hehe
Wasn’t it a Boeing 720 rather than a Boeing 707?
I think this test was done in the 1980s? Still impressive, thanks.