Boeing Revolutionizes Flight: 787 Dreamliner - Episode 2
Filed Under (Boeing 787) by Admin on 20-06-2009
Tagged Under : 787 Dreamliner Jets, Boeing, Boeing 787 Dreamliner, Boeing 787 Dreamliner Jets, Breakthrough, Comfort Features, Commercial Aviation, Episode 2, Planes, Travel
WELCOME ABOARD: Boeing’s new 787 Dreamliner is the next step in commercial aviation. The plane is loaded with breakthrough technological and passenger-comfort features. See all episodes & info @ TheAutoChannel.com. … Boeing 787 Dreamliner jets planes travel automotive
Search Aircraft

Refuse vaccines, they have toxic adjuvants like formaldehyde, MSG, Thimerosal(murcury), aluminum phosphate and other nasties. The World Homicide Organization is going to force nations of the world to vaccinate their populations in a couple months most likely, look for a propaganda campaign that will pressure you to get a “swine flu”(bioweapon) vaccine soon.
LOL
Read “Passenger Fixes Faulty Airliner”… the Boeing 757-200… BBC News 2009July09
Nice going… should I take some Araldite, superglue and string with me next time I fly on a Boeing? Just in case the wing-root starts to go, like on the 787 Dreamliner?
And as I recall, #3 is ‘get the us government to put in some orders for unnecessary military planes and pay up front’ instead of actually getting a *plain* government bailout THEN accuse the Europeans of not playing fair because their government’s bailouts to Airbus aren’t so obfuscated!
Or was that #4… after “Steal some good ideas from foreigners”?
I forget!
…dollars next and making the wings stay on the plane about #27, after beat the ‘pesky’ Europeans into the air first at #5!
Boeing understands the formula : PEOPLE FIRST
Have fun driving to LA from Europe
YO CHINESE JETS ARE THE BEST NOW !!!!
…
I just want to fly a boeing.
I hadn’t realized you had already seen the flight data recordings from the Air France crash nor had discovered the Yemenia crash was NOT due to FACT that the airline had the WORST RECORD of MAINTENENCE which, for a high-tech plane like any Airbus, means crashing is pretty much a given.
How can a Boeing ’shill’ like you blame Airbus for the failings of an airline with no proof?
Shouldn’t you be WAITING for facts?
I bet you rejoiced when those Airbus planes crashed. Good for the usa, right?
So the flight attendants can have something to watch
I think it might be somewhat early for the 787/A350 XWB for the 777 and A330s are fine,really!
Ok, just in case the Air France crashed because of the aircraft’s design,then it would be neccesesary for Airbus to build a new plane
Another cattle car. The airlines will stuff it with so many seats your knees will be up around your nipples. If you’re lucky you’ll get a smal bag of cheap nuts and a coke for $5.00. BTW how do airlines that are losing millions each month and dropping out of the sky with parts falling off, afford new aircraft that cost more than a small suburban community to build? Thanks, I’ll drive or take the train. Don’t like being treated lke a criminal either. If you’ve got time to spare, go by air!
usa is the main cause of many of the world’s ills; Wall St bankrolled Hitler in the 1930s (”Wall St and the Rise of Hitler” Sutton 1976) because it needed to export after their economy collapsed 1929 & usa still claims it won WWII when the Russians bought it with blood.
The aviation fuel in the planes that bombed London was from Standard Oil; usa’s finest! G**gle it!
Thanks america for lead in gasoline, CFCs, Climate Change & its Denial, WMD lies & NINJA mortgages.
Thanks very f*ckin’ much!
Think again Golf’.
The 787 may turn out to be unsafe and could lead to more deaths in crashes.
The new plane is mostly made from brittle carbon compounds rather than flexible aluminum.
The carbon-composite fuselage would also not survive a lightning strike as well as aluminum.
Vince Weldon was fired by Boeing after a 46-year career because of his persistent complaints about the design of the 787.
He claims he represents the view of others at Boeing who were afraid to speak out.
Interesting comment flangelet, I didn’t know that the American’s stole the designs from the British.
I’ll always remember it now as the Bell end 1.
The 787 Dreamliner plane may turn out to be unsafe and could lead to more deaths in crashes.
The new plane is mostly made from brittle carbon compounds rather than flexible aluminum.
The carbon-composite fuselage would also not survive a lightning strike as well as aluminum.
Vince Weldon was fired by Boeing after a 46-year career because of his persistent complaints about the design of the 787.
He claims he represents the view of others at Boeing who were afraid to speak out.
excuse me? your confusing one american as the whole united states? Hah, fuck you.
Dear All,
I have some questions about psychology on aviation:
*Why do we love flying?
*Why do we relate flying with our full potentials and with our successes?
*Why do we use the phases “take off” and “fly high” as a kind of adjectives to describe our success of our hard working?
*Why do we used the word “runway” as a expression of optimistic future of a person/ a team?
*Why do we relate aviation with freedom?
THANK YOU IN ADVANCE for your creative ideas and brainstorm!!!
@flangelet… Americans dont rejoice at Airbus wings breaking … otherwise they would be throwing a party for Air France 447.. you…
You spout shit and can’t back up anything…so when will the 500th a380 be completed so Airbus can break even on the project…they will make a record 18 this year.. so tell me when the a350 will be flying… how many more redesigns…prick…
@flangelet: you quote shit…and tell others they dont know what they are talking about…you might think 147% limit on a ultimate load test is PRETTY good but the FAA and EASA dont certify “PRETTY GOOD”..you prick… the 787 passed the load test well in advance of 150% and the 777 did 154%… Airbus installed reinforcements ONE YEAR after the first flight…Late 06 summer, Airbus was required to install a 66 lb wing strengthening package on the existing A380 fleet…you are a PRICK… MF
say what you want to. At least I’m an American. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH HAHAHAHAHAHHA
Am I wasting my time here with morons?
Do you know what a percentage is? What a test rig is? What a destructiuve stress test of a component is?
“Wow… woot the European’s wing broke.” America rejoices dumbly, waving that big foam #1 finger for all they’re worth. Well yeah… that’s what they do to test them for certification. Or didn’t you know that?
787 is still flawed. Just so you know, the normal Boreing design process was reduced to reduce the time to market.
The Airbus A380 wing broke in a test frame at 148% of expected stress on a wing that’s 111′ long ffs!
That’s EXCELLENT!
That’s what the test rigs are for, dummy!
Boeing designed a plane that isn’t strong enough where the body meets the wings and only discovered it a week before 1st flight.
That’s a flawed deathtrap!
Did Boeing intend to test the plane with robots or humans on it’s first flight?
Was that a week before the test-flight?
I quote
“It went to 148% of what it could ever realistically see in flight, their goal was 150%. FEA got it to within 3% of actual test results - That is pretty *GOOD* for that big of a complex stress analysis.”
The Boeing didn’t meet the 3% at the WING-ROOT!
QED… don’t quote *unless* you know what it means!
I see… much like the americans *only* got a “handbook on how to handle” jet engines, streamlining and airframes that can break the sound barrier (Bell X1 flown by Yeager was a British designed plane or didn’t they tell you that? G**gle “Miles M-52 Bell Yeager usa stolen designs” for more details) from Europe, namely stolen from the British.
If we start using composites to make out goods EVEN MORE fuel-efficient, you can say we’re even, dick!