i didn`t state “rebuild” nor did Fowlerflap, the airports would just have to ADD ON terminals to the airport. the Taxiways would be widened not rebuilt. either way the Airport will lose money to assure the plane will safely fit in the Airport, also don`t forget that operating costs for the A380 may be not so cheap for the airline operating it.
I SAID STOP BULLSHITTING. None of that is true. Per passenger the fuel efficiency is higher per person and it complies to laws which mean nothing has to be rebuilt unless it wants to flyto Southampton Airport.
Airports donnt need to change anything. If your british then watch richard hammonds engineering stuff on iplayer. I wish people would stop crapping. No airports need to be rebuilt there are legal limits for planes 80m wingspan ok NOTHING NEEDS TO BE REBUILT.
stop bullshitting. there are laws which the airbus applies to which determine sizes of aircrasft NO gates will have to be rebuilt NO taxiways or RUNWAYS. it is under 80m which is the legal limit. And its more fuel efficient per passenger so go suck your mothers penis. PEACE (: .
even with all these factors..Airbus will prove more popular with prople because of there curiosity, modern technology and safety. The prices for tickets on this thing are the same as any other plane. and it is more fuel efficient than the ancient elic 747. US are beaten hands down. if it didnt matter to ye why are ye trying to beat it??
It’s not Airbus’s fault is the Airliners choose to put all that fancy new space up to making more profits :(. And if there are more passengers per aircraft, ticket prices will be lower. Out of curiosity: why will airliners go out of business cause of this?
Yeah passengers that have millions of dollars. The A380 will just make our Economy even worse then Before. I say Boeing would again be the winner because the 747-8 would easily wipe the A380 out of the Market because it doesn`t require bigger gates, Taxiways, and runways. also it won`t cause Airliners to go out of business.
I love the A380 itself, but configuration of this specific airplane is awful. First class looks a lot worse than Business Class in British Airways 747! Nothing that You expect from abreakthrough airliner.. thankfuly Singapore Airlines config is better.
Thats why there are 192 firm orders already from some of the best airliners in the world, including Singapore, Virgin, Air France, Qantas, Emirates, BA etc. Heck, even China have ordered some. Fuel economy compared to planes like the 787 and A350 is something like 20% Lower per passenger. And the airline has a higher pressurisation compared to the 747 (5000 ft -A380, 8000 ft -747), making it comfier. Passengers will choose to fly on this aircraft.
Airbus originally projected it would break? even on the A380 with its 270th delivery of the jet, but that break-even number has ballooned to 420 following the model’s costly delay problems. AP says Airbus currently “has logged 189 orders or firm commitments for the plane.”
Airbus has gone though five CEOs as multiple delays in the A380 program resulted in massive write-offs and a restructuring plan that foresees 10,000 job cuts over four years — not to? mention billions of dollars in lost profit.
Such delays have hurt more than just profits: Airbus’ reputation has suffered, and U.S. rival Boeing Co. grabbed the top sales spot in 2006.
Whoa!!!! Looks like a giant seagull, man, without the poop!
I was wondering the exact same thing?!!!!
i didn`t state “rebuild” nor did Fowlerflap, the airports would just have to ADD ON terminals to the airport. the Taxiways would be widened not rebuilt. either way the Airport will lose money to assure the plane will safely fit in the Airport, also don`t forget that operating costs for the A380 may be not so cheap for the airline operating it.
no they arent per person the fuel efficiencty is higher than the planes you listed and NO ACCOMADATIONS WILL BE NEEDED AT AIRPORTS.
I SAID STOP BULLSHITTING. None of that is true. Per passenger the fuel efficiency is higher per person and it complies to laws which mean nothing has to be rebuilt unless it wants to flyto Southampton Airport.
Airports donnt need to change anything. If your british then watch richard hammonds engineering stuff on iplayer. I wish people would stop crapping. No airports need to be rebuilt there are legal limits for planes 80m wingspan ok NOTHING NEEDS TO BE REBUILT.
stop bullshitting. there are laws which the airbus applies to which determine sizes of aircrasft NO gates will have to be rebuilt NO taxiways or RUNWAYS. it is under 80m which is the legal limit. And its more fuel efficient per passenger so go suck your mothers penis. PEACE (: .
airbus? more like airbuilding.
even with all these factors..Airbus will prove more popular with prople because of there curiosity, modern technology and safety. The prices for tickets on this thing are the same as any other plane. and it is more fuel efficient than the ancient elic 747. US are beaten hands down. if it didnt matter to ye why are ye trying to beat it??
Ben Shirtoff?
Yeah British Airways Ordered some A380`s. I think they might get their A380`s by 2011, I`m not sure.
is it true that the UK has ordered the airbus a380..if so let me kno coz im livin inda UK
The plane it`self cost`s alot of money. And the price to operate the A380 would have the airlines running for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy.
The main reason why the Airlines would go out is.
1)the A380 takes Hundreds of Gallons which is more then the 747-400 and with today`s prices for fuel it won`t help t all.
2nd The operating costs as i said earlier would be too much for the airline to handle.
3 even if they say the price would be cheap it won`t because the airlines would lose money.
It’s not Airbus’s fault is the Airliners choose to put all that fancy new space up to making more profits :(. And if there are more passengers per aircraft, ticket prices will be lower. Out of curiosity: why will airliners go out of business cause of this?
Yeah passengers that have millions of dollars. The A380 will just make our Economy even worse then Before. I say Boeing would again be the winner because the 747-8 would easily wipe the A380 out of the Market because it doesn`t require bigger gates, Taxiways, and runways. also it won`t cause Airliners to go out of business.
Combined thrust of 80,000 pounds? Guess again PopMech, try 80,000 per engine.
I love the A380 itself, but configuration of this specific airplane is awful. First class looks a lot worse than Business Class in British Airways 747! Nothing that You expect from abreakthrough airliner.. thankfuly Singapore Airlines config is better.
Thats why there are 192 firm orders already from some of the best airliners in the world, including Singapore, Virgin, Air France, Qantas, Emirates, BA etc. Heck, even China have ordered some. Fuel economy compared to planes like the 787 and A350 is something like 20% Lower per passenger. And the airline has a higher pressurisation compared to the 747 (5000 ft -A380, 8000 ft -747), making it comfier. Passengers will choose to fly on this aircraft.
just watch this plane crash like the titanic..
i no man ur a freak shit do u read boeing n airbus shit in ur spare time loser
Actually we don’t know what you’re saying, but we will after we have a Cryptologist decipher what you typed.
Airbus originally projected it would break? even on the A380 with its 270th delivery of the jet, but that break-even number has ballooned to 420 following the model’s costly delay problems. AP says Airbus currently “has logged 189 orders or firm commitments for the plane.”
Airbus has gone though five CEOs as multiple delays in the A380 program resulted in massive write-offs and a restructuring plan that foresees 10,000 job cuts over four years — not to? mention billions of dollars in lost profit.
Such delays have hurt more than just profits: Airbus’ reputation has suffered, and U.S. rival Boeing Co. grabbed the top sales spot in 2006.